E-mail Scott
Links to
other sites


Letters to
the editor

Blog Archives:
2003 - 2004
2005 - 2006
2007 - 2008

"Junkie" taunts discredit attackers, not Limbaugh

By Scott Tibbs, May 23, 2008

It is common knowledge that radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh admitted becoming addicted to prescription painkillers in 2003. Limbaugh started taking painkillers after back surgery years earlier, and became addicted to them. Limbaugh is alleged to have engaged in criminal activity by "doctor shopping" to get his hands on the drug. Many Leftists seized on Limbaugh's previous comments denouncing drug use and calling for prosecution of illegal drug users, pointing out the "hypocrisy" in Limbaugh's life.

While breaking the law cannot be excused, I would point out that getting addicted to legally prescribed prescription drugs is different from taking drugs that are completely illegal. Limbaugh is not the same as someone who gets hooked on heroin, cocaine or methamphetamine. In fact, there have been concerns about the addictive properties of Oxycontin that led to a lawsuit by Bloomington attorney Ken Nunn.

The "hypocrisy" argument has some merit when discussing Limbaugh's views on drug policy. However, bringing up the Oxycontin addiction and using pejorative names like "junkie" are completely irrelevant when discussing Limbaugh's views on other subjects, such as global warming, crossover voting or tax policy. Calling Limbaugh a "junkie" is an insult and a taunt that does not in any way refute the arguments he makes on such issues. It is a perfect example of the ad hominem logical fallacy.

A further (highly dishonest) Leftist taunt is that Limbaugh was caught three years later with prescription drugs prescribed to someone else. However, it has been well documented that the prescription was meant for Limbaugh, but was in his doctor's name to protect Limbaugh's privacy. As was reported at the time, "it is generally not illegal in Florida for a medication to be prescribed in a third party's name if all parties are aware and the doctor documents it properly." (See articles here, here and here.)

It is well known that Barack Hussein Obama, the Democrat Party's presumptive nominee for President, admitted using cocaine in his youth. Does this in any way affect his qualifications to be President? No. In fact, Obama's admission of past misdeeds is a testament to his character. Nonetheless, if Leftists want to insult and taunt Rush Limbaugh or his supporters by bringing up Limbaugh's chemical dependency, they have little credibility to complain when conservatives respond by calling Barack Hussein Obama a cokehead.

A better option, however, is for Leftists to abandon the "junkie" taunts and behave like respectful adults capable of civil political discourse. Of course, we all know that is not going to happen.